New Research Connecting Tertullian to the U.S. First Amendment Freedom of Religion Clauses

What if I told you the Church Fathers, not the Founding Fathers, wrote the First Amendment? Stay tuned for a startling new discovery!

Pop Quiz! Think back to your high school U.S. Government course or Poli-Sci 101 in college. Where did all the great ideas in the U.S. Constitution come from? Where did the Founding Fathers get all those great ideas?

The Enlightenment, right? John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Social Contract. Baron de Montesquieu and The Spirit of the Laws. All the great minds. Right?


Separation of Powers and the three branches of government? Sure, that can be traced to the Baron de Montesquieu.

The Freedom of Religion, however, is far more ancient.

This is the premise of a new book by Robert Louis Wilken, Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom (see links below).

Robert Louis Wilken's Liberty in the Things of God

Wilken is a the William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of the History of Christianity emeritus at the University of Virginia. Wilken's The Spirit of Early Christian Thought: Seeking the Face of God is required reading in many schools of Theology, including the one I attended.

I highly recommend all of Wilken's books, but it is Wilken's most recent book Liberty in the Things of God that will be the subject of this article. In it, Wilken makes a startling discovery.

Christian Origins of Freedom of Religion

What ancient communities do you think might have something to say about freedom of religion? Those communities which faced terrible religious persecution.

Crucifixion after crucifixion, the Christian community suffered religious persecution at the hands of the Romans. The Christians nonetheless endured and prospered.

Nearly all of Jesus' Apostles were martyred. St. Peter was crucified upside-down in Rome. St. Paul was eventually beheaded after a period of imprisonment in Rome.

There were also the virgin martyrs of Rome, including Saints Agnes, Agatha, and Lucy, who died in the persecutions led by Emperors Decius and Diocletian.

Saints Felicity and Perpetua, both mothers, were also martyred by the Roman Empire. They were not Italians, though. Felicity and Perpetua were from North Africa, specifically Carthage.

Tertullian and "Freedom of Religion"

Along with Saints Felicity and Perpetua, there was also a Church Father from Carthage. Tertullian.[1] Some scholars actually credit the writing or editing of the Passion of Saints Felicity and Perpetua to Tertullian. Tertullian is one of the primary reasons we even remember Saints Felicity and Perpetua into modern times.

Tertullian coined a few very important words and phrases. For starters, Tertullian first coined the phrase "Old and New Testaments". Tertullian also first gave us the word "Trinity" (Latin trinitas) to describe the three Divine Persons. Read more about that here.

Put another way, the perfect self-governing community of Persons - the Holy Trinity - Tertullian named that!

But What Does Tertullian have to do with "Freedom of Religion"?

Here's another incredible connection. In addition to "Old and New Testaments" and "Trinity", Tertullian also was the first to coin the phrase "Freedom of Religion."

Wow. Wouldn't it be incredible if somehow Tertullian's writings inspired the Founding Fathers?

Because that's exactly what happened.

Wilken's Discovery: The Connection between Thomas Jefferson and Tertullian

Anti-Catholic sentiment was very strong among many of the Founding Fathers. Many of our Founding Fathers were Deists, who basically believed in a "Watchmaker" God that never intervened in human history. How could Jesus' Incarnation into human history possibly fit into this worldview? Moreover, how could the Catholic Church, the institution which perpetuates Jesus' intervention into human history?

This is one of Thomas Jefferson's more well-known quotes on religion:

Honest religion neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg.

This is taken from a longer passage in Jefferson's work, Notes on the State of Virginia:

The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subjects to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

Wilken noticed that this quote as well as the context it fit into resembled the following quote from Tertullian.

You can see that the line in bold - "neither harms nor helps" - matches AT LEAST IN STRUCTURE the line, "neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg":

It is only just and a privilege inherent in human nature that every person should be able to worship according to his own convictions. The religious practice of one person neither harms nor helps another. It is not part of religion to coerce religious practice. For it is by choice, not coercion, that we should be led to religion.

But how could Wilken prove this connection? It is not a direct quote, though there is a match in meaning and neither/nor structure.

What did Thomas Jefferson write in the Margins of His Personal Copy of Notes on the State of Virginia?

How could Wilken possibly prove this connection? Remember, I said Wilken is a professor emeritus at the University of Virginia (UVA).

Guess who just happens to have Thomas Jefferson's personal copy of Notes on the State of Virginia? You guessed it. The UVA Rare Book Library.

Wilken turned to the page in Jefferson's personal copy on which the above quote - honest religion "neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg" - is found.

Guess what Wilken found scribbled in the margins? Tertullian's quote!

Thomas Jefferson had scribbled Tertullian's quote in the margins in the original Latin.

But there's still more ...

Thomas Jefferson's Personal Copy of Tertullian 

Wilken knew that Thomas Jefferson had written a bookseller in Richmond for some copies of Latin manuscripts. Wilken wondered if perhaps there might be a Tertullian manuscript among the collection of books that Jefferson had purchased from Richmond.

While finishing his own book, Liberty in the Things of God, Wilken was researching in the Library of Congress. Guess which library contains most of Thomas Jefferson's personal library? The Library of Congress. Still curious about the Tertullian connection, Wilken decided to see if Jefferson's personal library contained a collection of Tertullian's writings.

It did. The Library of Congress allowed Wilken to look through Thomas Jefferson's personal copy of a 17th century Latin edition of Tertullian's writings.

Wilken turned to the page from which Thomas Jefferson had transcribed the above quote from Tertullian - the one which begins, "It is only just and a privilege inherent in human nature ..."

Jefferson had underlined the quote and put a big "X" in the margin beside it.

Isn't that amazing. Wilken was able to find a direct connection between Tertullian and Thomas Jefferson.

But there's still more!

Compare Tertullian's quote to the First Amendment

Here's my addition to all this. This might be something I notice being a lawyer.

The connection from Tertullian to Thomas Jefferson does not end at Notes on the State of Virginia. Look at the First Amendment, itself! Look at the Freedom of Religion clauses of the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...

Look at the either/or structure and content of the Freedom of Religion section of the First Amendment:

  • First there is the Free Exercise Clause: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
  • Next there is the Establishment Clause: "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"  

Now, look again at Tertullian's quote. Not the middle part about religion "neither harming nor helping". I have omitted that below. Look at the sentences which come before and after that:

It is only just and a privilege inherent in human nature that (1) every person should be able to worship according to his own convictions ... It is (2) not part of religion to coerce religious practice. For it is by choice, not coercion, that we should be led to religion.

Do you see it?

  • Part One is about Free Exercise of religion, including worship and conscience protections. 
  • Part Two is about the coercive power of an Established Church. 

Do you know what this means? Tertullian wrote the first draft of the First Amendment and Thomas Jefferson knew it. Tertullian's quote contains the archae-Free Exercise Clause and the archae-Establishment Clause.

Isn't that incredible?

There's still more!

This means that the Freedom of Religion, from Roman times to the writing of the U.S. Constitution, included conscience protections, not merely a freedom to worship.

Please share this incredible discovery with your friends and family. Feel "FREE" to comment below, as well, with any questions you might have.

Footnotes on Tertullian:

[1] In case you are wondering, that's not a typo. Tertullian is not Saint Tertullian because he fell into a couple heresies along the way, including Montanism. Tertullian is one of only Church Fathers not to be considered a saint. Describing Tertullian as a "Church Father" is also the minority position. For more on that, check out this video from Jimmy Akin and Catholic Answers. 

Post a Comment


  1. Tertullian (note: NOT St. Tertullian) is not a Church Father. He is an important writer from the Patristic Age, yes, but not a Church Father.

    1. Right, that's why I addressed all that in footnote #1.